En son beş C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı Kentsel haber

En son beş C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı Kentsel haber

Blog Article

That is, you hayat create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface.

= to provide value equality checks (vs the default reference equality check). The MSDN documentation suggests you only do it for immutable types. There are also issues involving interfaces and operator overloading.

If you want to implement IEquatable in a class hierarchy you güç use the following pattern. It prevents derived (including sibling) classes from being equal.

LBushkinLBushkin 131k3333 gold badges217217 silver badges265265 bronze badges 11 8 Why dirilik't you just specify an IEqualityComparer yourself that does this? What does the IStructuralEquatable interface add to this?

In this equating the values in arrays may be same or different but their object references are equal.

I never put much thought into using a struct over a class or even additional optimizations because to me the struct was optimized already. When I was working on fixing a bug in our DeviceDisplay to derece trigger new events unless a value changed a whole new world opened up to me.

If those objects do derece contain equality/hashcode methods that satisfy that contract, you will have to wrap them and provide correct implementations for those methods yourself in the wrapper.

We birey also make our own container play well with these other containers by implementing these interfaces.

comparer IEqualityComparer İki nesnenin müsavi olup olmadığını değerlendirmek yürekin kullanılacak yöntemi tanılamamlayan nesne.

Bu örnekte, articles1 ve articles2 dizileri aynı makale mirlıklarına aynı tam iye olduğundan, CompareTo metodu 0 döndürerek bu dizilerin yapısal olarak bedel olduğunu belirtir.

To achieve this, employee objects with matching SSN properties would be treated birli logically equal, even if they were not structurally equal. Share Improve this answer Follow

The example on MSDN gives part of the answer here; it seems to be useful for heterogeneous equality, rather than homogeneous equality - i.e. for testing whether two objects (/values) of potentially different types

Just look at the default ValueType.Equals(object) code that C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri gets called otherwise. It's an absolute performance killer that introduces boxing, type evaluation and finally falls back on reflection if any of the fields are reference types.

While writing my own immutable ByteArray class that uses a byte array internally, I implemented the IStructuralEquatable interface.